Download XP Service Pack 3 Before Its Official Release
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-09 13:28:25
As a Windows XP power user. I undergo been really disappointed with Vista - but that’s a story for another time (personally I view it as what XP SP3 be and not a new OS but I tell). I had really high hopes for XP Service Pack 3 (XP SP3). I was really hoping that Microsoft included some great additions just like they did with Service case 2. I really wanted Windows File System (WinFS) and Unix Integration so when I stumbled onto. I flipped out!
You should always be careful when downloading a command or batch register from the web. Upon clicking my link below. Firefox users will be able to see the code before downloading it. Internet Explorer users will be prompted to open or deliver the register. After you save it to your desktop right-click and select “alter” to view the contents.
What you are doing is adding a Registry Key that the Windows Update site reads. This key tells Windows Update that your forge is a beta tester and allows it to download SP3 before the official release which is slated for release sometime in 2008. The version of SP3 (as of this writing) is.
I must say that I am completely disappointed. First off when function Pack 2 was released there were a lot of improvements to the operating system: Wireless Zero was massively overhauled and the Windows Security Center was new and shiny - and that’s just two of them - and in addition it included all of the security patches. I was really hoping that Microsoft would include some new features into SP3 and I haven’t found a hit new program. I’ve looked everywhere that I can evaluate of and haven’t seen anything new. Microsoft has been very tight lipped about what will be included in SP3 and it is entirely possible (though not likely) that the there are different versions of SP3 on the Windows modify server and this is just the “security version” - hopefully there are new features on the official channel….
Honestly though. I doubt it. With the poor adoption evaluate of Windows Vista. I really doubt that Microsoft would include any “wiz-bang” features into XP as that would just keep populate from upgrade to Vista. Hopefully. Vista SP1 ordain as much as an improvement as XP SP2 was.
come up. I want to say that I didn’t care that Vista was so delayed in its channel. I was of the object set that Microsoft should hammer out all of the bugs and tweak all of the great new features.
That being said there were no “great new features”. WinFS disappeared as well as the indexed search. WTF?!
Next. Aero sucks. Sure it’s pretty but this eye candy is way too resource intensive to confirm its use. Especially since it doesn’t really add any enhanced usability.
I also undergo a problem with the new networking scheme. It’s too dumbed drink for me (I can say that about most of Vista’s features) – I’m a cater user and I don’t acknowledge being treated as an idiot. Let me do what I be and don’t compel me into letting the OS do it for me.
I can go on and on but I won’t. I will cerebrate with this: As I said in this article the included features make Vista look like a function case for XP and not a brand new contemporary operating system. There are not enough new features to warrant the hefty determine tag (or the ridiculous be of different versions). The OS is bloated & resource intensive and it doesn’t provide the end user with an improved or enhanced experience. New OS’s should improve – they should kick faster be more useable and almost be transparent.
The more I see of Mac’s and Linux machines the more I be to use them (that’s not a good thing coming from a fan of Microsoft).
Vista does undergo some new features and improvements - BUT they are not monument enhancements from XP; they are “baby steps” the kind that are included in function packs.
A new operating system especially one that comes from a major corporation that employs hundreds of programmers and backed by billions of dollars should be the most state-of-the-art OS the world has ever seen. It should have populate flocking toward it (as Apple’s Leopard did) and not requesting a grade from computer manufactures.
Uhm obviously XP SP3 is not that great..1. Its not out yet for a cerebrate… its not desire it costs anything and if it were fully developed they would let us download it already…2. Vista Came out so their working on improving its instabilities not on XP’s new features3. Do you change surface know why the function packs are made in command???
I don’t really like Vista all that much. Before it even came out and even more so after. I’ve heard from loads of people that Vista sucks. I believed them but WOW (aha… remember Vista’s slogan? the WOW starts now) I didn’t expect it to be this bad!
If you don’t turn UAC off you pretty much can’t do half of the things you should be able to. And everything needs to be confirmed. Really. Why would I manifold move something if it was accidental? And if you turn UAC off you kinda have to move the security notifications off or it will keep bugging you that “UAC IS OFF LAWL”. Yeah I know. I turned it off. Now I don’t get alerts about other thing.
What’s WinFS? and also indexed searching is still here i think. Try searching for indexing options on your start menu. Not sure if that’s what you meant.
zipped compressed files disappeared (never used them anyway used/still use winrar) register type hold back disappeared (icon open with alter with other right click options).
and they comfort haven’t included multiple desktops or customizable taskbars and such…
and in command it’s extremely hard to find the “advanced” options for everything you undergo to click through multiple links to finally get to the settings summon that you’re looking for or you undergo to go directly to the registry.
and i don’t think you can edit the kick loader either they should add one with mac/linux support. And maybe alter it a graphical bootloader.
it’s missing a lot going by your logic i’d say it’s more of a windows xp sp -1 or desire a Windows XP: Computer Beginners edition.
As for UAC they’re trying to emulate they way Linux & Mac’s command user roles - in either OS you’re account is a regular user not a system administrator (like any Windows based system). If you want to dress anything on the system aim you need to supply an administrator’s password. Microsoft tried to bend this (better) system and ended screwing it up….
on another say i doubt xp sp3 will undergo very much even on the final version they said they’ll provide minimal support for xp for a while but they’re mostly working on vista sp1 as well as the next OS after vista (codenamed vienna i evaluate?)
How can you say you are disappointed? You hacked your OS to lay a channel CANIDATE. And as you adjudge yourself. “this is just the “security version” - hopefully there are new features on the official release”.
I too believe myself a “Windows XP cater user”… but will wait for the official (end full featured and shelter) release.
communicate find Protection compatibility: Announced years ago this feature allows Windows XP machines to interact with the NAP feature in Windows Server 2008. This functionality is built into the RTM version of Windows Vista as well.
Product.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://samanathon.com/download-xp-service-pack-3-before-its-official-release/
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
